95% of the people who fired Meme are losing money?

Todju, the gold fortune.

Summary:Recently, Meme coins have become a hot topic in the encrypted market again. Unlike Meme, which was previously concentrated on Solana, Base and so forth, this meme fever is being driven by Robinhod Chain.

I. Recent hot-hot Robinwood Chain Meme

1.CASHCAT：327.75%

CASHCAT is one of the most representative tokens in the current cycle of Meme-led by Robin Chain.

Cash Cat was the name that the Robinhood team had considered for use, so the community used it as a Meme and launched CASHCAT on Robinth Chain. CASHCAT is not officially issued by Robinhod, nor does it represent Robinhod himself.

According to Coingecko, CASHCAT reached a high point of $0.373 on 4 September, which is 327.75 per cent higher than the low point of $0.0872 on 19 August.

The case of the rich.

On 1 September, CoinDesk reported that a chain dealer had previously invested about $106.5 million to buy and sell the CASHCAT, and then sold it in full at approximately $6.72 million, resulting in a single transaction of approximately $5.666 million.

On 8 July, an early CASHCAT buyer turned $86 into $390,000 within 20 days, monitored by Onchain Lens. The wallet bought 17.5 million CASHCATs on 19 June, sold 15.29 million CASHCATs within 4 hours of reaching a market value of $125 million.

Details on CASHCAT are available."CASHCAT BIG UP IN 2000 % ROBINHUOD'S KEY AGREEMENT RECEIVATION"

2.PONS：3156.16%

Pons is a non-hosting token launchpad that runs on Robinwood Chain, and users can create tokens directly through their wallets and complete transactions along the chain. Official documents show that the core location of Pons is “Launch and traded-supplely tokens on Robin Chain”, i.e. helping users quickly issue and trade fixed supply tokens on Robinwood Chain. With the rapid growth of Meme transactions on Robinwood Chain and the simultaneous expansion of Pons, PONS tokens received market attention.

According to Coingecko, PONS tokens reached a historical high of $0.9508 on 6 September, an increase of 3156.16 per cent over the low point of 0.0292 on 19 August.

The case of the rich.

On 5 September, the latest warehouse of KOL Bonk Guy (@theuniipcs) was encrypted and showed that its PONS hold rate of return exceeded 13,420 per cent, resulting in a single currency surplus of $9.08 million.

On 4 September, CUMBUCKET.ETH, monitored by Onchain Lens, converted $5,650 to $2.4 million through PONS, at an initial cost of only 3.17 ETH (approximately $5,650) to buy 4.73 million PONS; to date, the whale has sold 3.73 million PONS, profiting approximately $1.74 million and still holds 1 million PONS (approximately $666,000). 

On 4 September, according to Lokonchain monitoring, the encrypted portfolio of Koll Unitcs grew by some $6.3 million over the past day. Of this amount, Unitcs had only purchased 10.9 million PONS at a cost of $677 million and never sold since then. The value of the PONS it currently holds has risen to about $7.52 million, with book profits of approximately $7.45 million and investment returns exceeding 110 times.

Details about PONS are available."Pons Expiration Robinhod Chain is becoming a new battleground for Meme"?

3.AI：10579.31%

AI (Artificial Inu) combines the AI narrative, Meme culture and monetized stocks. The project officially locates it as “the new dog on Wall Street”, with core narratives centred around artificial intelligence, arithmetic and Nvidia.Network of officialsInformation indicates that AI is essentially Memecoin and does not represent NVIDIA equities. The main liquidity pool of AI is not paired with traditional crypto assets such as USDC, USDT or ETH, but directly with the tokenized NVDA shares of Robinhod.

According to Coingecko, AI reached a historical high of $0.3097 on 3 September, an increase of 105.79.31 per cent over the low point of $0.0029 as at 9 August.

The case of the rich.

According to data on the public chain on 28 August, user “DumbCrayonEater” turned $24,000 into nearly $3 million. By that time, the wallet had approximately 29.3 million AIs, valued at about $2.6 million, and was one of the second largest holders of AI.

4.BISCOTTI

BISCOTTI is a community-driven Memeco.Network of officialsAn orange dog, described as an orange dog wearing a green Robin Hood hat, is at the heart of the narrative: “Robin Hood of Robinhood Chain.” The authorities have made it clear that it has no official connection to Robinhod Markets, Robinhod Chain, nor any agreed income or operational function, which is essentially community Meme currency.

BISCOTTI came online in Robinhod Chain at the end of August 2026, and subsequently landed on 27 August on trading platforms such as MEXC, Lbank. The outbreak of BISCOTTI was very fast, with WEEX showing that it had a market value of about $15 million within hours of going online, which then fell back to the vicinity of approximately $6 million.

According to Coingecko, the BISCOTTI rose to a maximum of $0.0047 on 7 September, an increase of 123.81 per cent over its lowest point of $0.0021 on 5 September.

The case of the rich.

There are no real cases of wealth in mainstream media.

On 28 August, Cincodias reported that, according to CoinMarketCap data, the valuation had more than 9900 per cent higher than in one day on-line in Biscotti. The report also noted that the round had been driven mainly by speculative demand.

Two, 95% of those who fire Meme are losing money?

There are always stories of a one-night boom in the encrypted market, but it may not be as good as it would have been if the viewers had been extended to the entire Meme market.

According to unfolded post on X: Over 95% of FOMO-based traders have lost or barely earned anything since Robinwood Chain went online. Of 375,740 users, only 229 made more than $10,000, which is 0.06%.

Thus, the case of the one-night boom above is a very bad one, and most people end up at a loss in this Meme game.

But is it true that only such a small group of lucky people are making money?

The answer is that there is a real lack of money, but not necessarily so little.

According to CoinGecko, the losses were common among traders who had settled on the Pump.fun platform. From April 2024 to the end of 2025, most active traders on the Pump.fun platform ended each month at a loss of just over 50 per cent and fell to bottom in June 2025, at 30.1 per cent. Interestingly, this trend seems to have shifted; In February 2026, the share of profitable traders reached 56.8 per cent and increased to 70.0 per cent and 73.3 per cent in March and April 2026, respectively.

Thus, while Meme does not have to run into some major losses, the Meme market is highly divided in terms of returns. Only a very small number of large gains can be achieved and many ordinary participants tend to get only modest gains, even if they do not suffer huge losses.

One of the biggest differences between Memeco and traditional crypto assets is that their prices tend to be highly dependent on attention, emotions and inflows of funds.

Once some kind of meme-dollar fire has broken out, early participants have a clear cost advantage. That is why extreme profits are more common in the Meme market than hundreds of times.

But at the same time, it is impossible for all people to make money in Meme’s transactions, especially the pure Meme project that has not actually been applied. When there is insufficient follow-up funding, the early profit earners are the real losses of the late master.

Such bad luck cannot escape even the once-known TRUMP coins, LIBRAs etc.

TRUMP had produced a large amount of wealth effects at the beginning of 2025, and on the first day on which TRUMP went online, according to analysis in The New York Times, on the first day of the TRUMP deal, one user bought nearly 6 million coins for only 18 cents. Two days later, the mysterious user sold all his tokens and made a profit of $109 million. However, an analysis of the wallets on their chains by Chainalysis shows that over 813,000 purses were in deficit and accumulated losses of about $2 billion during the first 19 days after they were online. During the same period, Trump-related entities and partners received approximately $100 million in transaction costs.

In February 2025, LIBRA stormed about $4.55 in a short time and then collapsed sharply. Nansen data show that among its relevant traders, large amounts of wallets eventually run out of revenue, while a few early traders have earned millions of dollars. For example, one of the successful early traders achieved some $6.5 million in profits.

Summary

The story of the rich will always be easier to spread than the story of the lost, but it will be hard to get through to me. When survivors' deviations lead every ordinary Meme investor to think that he is lucky and continues to use real money and silver, the loss may have been doomed.

According to current data, the Meme ecology on Robinhod Chain has been characterized by a similar phenomenon: currency coins like CASHCAT, PONS, AI, BISCOTTI have surged in short periods of time, then returned to varying degrees, and have been accompanied by numerous cases of wealth-making, but most traders have not become rich. After all, behind these myths of abundance, people have to pay for it.